Subscribe to continue reading
Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.
This week, for Photo Friday, I identify the people in five more envelopes from the Ethel Wight Studio Collection[i]. The envelopes typically contain the name of the person who paid for the photos, not necessarily of the individual portrayed in the image. Analyzing the pictures and information is vital to identify the individual therein.[ii] Ultimately, my goal is to reunite the photos with family members who may have never seen the image.
The envelope this negative was in says, “Miss Carolyn Stanley, 164 Dartmouth St #359.”
Why I believe this to be the individual.
Ancestry has 18 public trees that refer to Carolyn Stanley. Family Search has profile GMQR-BR5 for Carolyn. The only photograph in this photo package contains an image that is “immodest” and cannot be uploaded to Family Search. As such, I have cropped it and uploaded the cropped photo to her Family Search profile. Family members who want a copy of the original image should contact me directly.
This negative envelope says, “Mr. James Stanley, 34 Columbia RD, #52 (DHS).”
Why I believe this to be the individual.
Ancestry has 14 public trees that refer to James Getchell Stanley. Family Search does not appear to have a profile for James. I uploaded a photo of James photo to Dead Fred. I also uploaded four additional images of James to my Flickr Photostream.
This negative envelope says, “Mrs. Mary Stacy, 22 Norwood St #927.”
Why I believe this to be the individual.
I have not found Mary C Stacy, Frank J Stacy, or Frank S Stacy in the 1930 or 1940 US Census records. So, I can’t fully determine her identity. I am sure this is Mary Stacy, the wife of Frank J Stacy, and likely the mother of Frank S Stacy.
I uploaded a photo of Mary Stacy photo to Dead Fred. I also uploaded two additional photos of Mary to my Flickr photostream.
This negative envelope says, “Mrs. William A Soule, 38 Westminster Av #815.”
Why I believe this to be the individual.
Ancestry has one public tree that refers to William Alfred Soule (1924-1990). Family Search does not appear to have a profile for William, so I uploaded this photo to Dead Fred.
This negative envelope says, “Mrs. Ida Star, 46 Kellog St. #173.”
Why I believe this to be the individual.
I am sure this photo is of Ida Star, taken in 1934 when she was about 47.
I have not found Ida Star in Ancestry trees nor determined her maiden name. Neither does she appear to have a profile at Family Search. Consequently, I have only uploaded her photo to Dead Fred.
I will love to hear your reaction if any of these photos are of your family member. Especially if this photo is of a loved one for whom you hadn’t seen this photograph before.
Due to software limitations, the images uploaded to Family Search, Dead Fred, and Flickr have higher quality than those linked here.
For all postings of the Ethel Wight Collection, please see here.
[i] The Wight Studio was in Portland, Maine. Many thanks to Ethel Wight’s family for access to and permission to use the collection of their great aunt.
[ii] These images were converted to positives using a lightbox, a Nikon camera and computer software.
This week, for Photo Friday, I identify the people in five more envelopes from the Ethel Wight Studio Collection[i]. The envelopes typically contain the name of the person who paid for the photos, not necessarily of the individual portrayed in the image. It is vital to analyze the pictures and information to identify the individual therein.[ii] Ultimately, my goal is to reunite the photos with family members who may have never seen the image.
This negative envelope says, “Miss Kathryn Snow – Children’s Hospital #182.”
Why I believe this to be the individual.
I am confident this is a photo of Katharine Louise Snow (1914-2000), daughter of Milford and Sarah (Pettee) Snow.
Ancestry has 11 public trees that refer to Katharine. Family Search has profile GQHB-ZCM for Katherine L Snow, the daughter of Milford & Sarah (Pettee) Snow. I uploaded two photos of Katharine to her Family Search Memories.
This negative envelope says, “Miss Nathlin Smith, St. Barnabas Hospital #1041.”
What I learned about Nathlin Smith:
I could not identify Nathlin Smith other than her name as written on the envelope, so I uploaded her photo to Dead Fred.
This negative envelope says, “Mrs. Roscoe Smith, 28 Tremont St #145.”
Why I believe this to be the individual.
I am confident this photo is of Roscoe, Jr. and Joan F Smith, the children of Roscoe and Bernice Smith, about 1934.
Roscoe Nason Smith, Junior, is found in eight Ancestry public trees. Joan does not appear to be in any Ancestry public trees. Neither appear in Family Search profiles, so I posted their photo to Dead Fred.
Confirmed to be Roscoe by one of his children.
This negative envelope says, “Mrs. Roscoe Smith, 28 Tremont St #144.”
Why I believe this to be the individual.
Joan is not found in any Ancestry trees nor in Family Search profiles. I uploaded this photo of Joan to Dead Fred.
The envelope this negative was in says, “Adelaid & Loretta Sobill – 1942 – DSCN4920P.”
What I discovered.
However, I did find Adelaide Ann and Loretta Sopiel. Adelaide was born on 9 February 1933, and Loretta was born about 1935. Several records indicate Loretta was born in 1929. However, the 1940 Census indicates she was five years old in 1940. Both were born at the Passamaquoddy Pleasant Point Reservation in Washington County, Maine. If Loretta was born in 1935, making her seven years old in 1942, then I believe these are the two sisters. If Loretta was born in 1929, she was about 13 in 1942, older than I think either of these children are.
Ten Ancestry public trees refer to Adelaide Ann Sopiel, and three Ancestry public trees refer to Mary Loretta Sopiel, two of the children of David Toma and Eliza (Dana) Sopiel. Please let me know if you know this family and can identify these two children. Because I have not identified the individuals in this photo sufficiently to upload to either Family Search or Dead Fred, so I only include the image here.
I will love to hear your reaction if any of these photos are of your family member. Especially if this photo is of a loved one for whom you hadn’t seen this photograph before.
Due to software limitations, the images uploaded to Family Search and Dead Fred have higher quality than those linked to here.
For all postings in the Ethel Wight Collection, please see here.
[i] The Wight Studio was in Portland, Maine. Many thanks to Ethel Wight’s family for access to and permission to use the collection of their great aunt.
[ii] These images were converted to positives using a lightbox, a Nikon camera and computer software.
This week, for Photo Friday, I identify the people in five more envelopes from the Ethel Wight Studio Collection[i]. The envelopes typically contain the name of the person who paid for the photos, not necessarily of the individual portrayed in the image. Analyzing the pictures and information is vital to identify the individual therein.[ii] Ultimately, my goal is to reunite the photos with family members who may have never seen the image.
The envelope this negative was in says, “Miss Elna Smith, St. Barnabas Hospital #332.”
Why I believe this to be the individual.
Although I am sure this is Elna Smith, which of several different Elnas I can’t determine. As such, I uploaded a photo of her to Dead Fred.
This negative envelope says, “Miss Eudora Smith, 390 Park Ave #66.”
Why I believe this to be the individual.
Ancestry has 14 public trees that refer to Eudora. Family Search has profile GZHV-W2D for Vera Eudora Smith, daughter of Albert D and Letha Vietta (Beverage) Smith. I uploaded a photo of Eudora to her Family Search Memories. I also uploaded two more pictures of her to my Flickr Photostream.
This negative envelope says, “Miss Gladys E Smith ℅ C. W. Page, Hampden Highlands, Me #670.”
Why I believe this to be the individual.
I believe this photo is of Gladys Esther Smith in 1935 when she was about 20 years old.
Ancestry has 15 public trees that refer to Gladys Esther Smith. Family Search has profile GVSW-XYW for Gladys. I have uploaded a photo of Gladys to her Family Search Memories.
This negative envelope says, “Miss Lucille Smith, 392 St. John St #606.”
Why I believe this to be the individual.
This photo of Lucille was taken in 1935, probably just before she married George P Comas on 21 Apr 1935.
Ancestry has ten public trees that refer to Lucille M Smith (later Comas, later Calderwood). Family Search has profile MGHM-K5N for Lucille Mae Smith, born 28 Sep 1915 to Everett and Christine (Taylor0 Smith. I uploaded a photo of Lucille to her Family Search Memories.
This negative envelope says, “Mr. Leavitt Smith, 66 Smith St #1049 – DSCN4904P.”
Why I believe this to be the individual.
I am sure this photo is of Richard, taken in 1936 when he was about nine.
I have not found Richard in Ancestry trees. However, his father, Leavitt, is in five public Ancestry trees. Family Search has profile G372-Q99 for Richard R Smith, son of Leavitt and Gertrude (Reardon) Smith. According to Family Search, Richard died in 1983. I have uploaded a photo of him to his Family Search Memories.
I will love to hear your reaction if any of these photos are of your family member. Especially if this photo is of a loved one for whom you hadn’t seen this photograph before.
Due to software limitations, the images uploaded to Family Search, Dead Fred, and Flickr have higher quality than those linked here.
For all postings of the Ethel Wight Collection, please see here.
[i] The Wight Studio was in Portland, Maine. Many thanks to Ethel Wight’s family for access to and permission to use the collection of their great aunt.
[ii] These images were converted to positives using a lightbox, a Nikon camera and computer software.
Family Search indicates that Mannin can be an Irish variant of Mannion and is found in Finland, the United States, and England. Manning can be an English variation of Ó Mainnin or is a survival of the Old English personal name Manning.
Forebears indicates that Mannin and Manning are preserved in terms such as “Manningford, Manningham, Mannington, and Manningtree, all parishes set down in Crockford.”
In either event, most websites suggest it is an Angelized form of an Irish name. Manning is over 1000 times more common than Mannin.
People with the Manning surname number about 145,000 and most live in the following:
In the United States, the greatest incidence of Mannings occur in Texas, California, and Florida.
In frequency, you are most likely to find Mannings in Vermont and Massachusetts, where more than one in every 2000 people have the surname.
Great-grandma Brown (née Manning) is the only direct Manning ancestor I’ve ever known. Her father died in 1888, and her grandfather died in 1907. She might have known her great-grandfather Meredith Mannin, who died when she was seven. However, she moved to Minnesota with her grandparents when she was about four years old, and Meredith did not move to Minnesota.
Mary Elizabeth (Manning) Brown lived in Sylvan, Cass County, Minnesota, with her husband, Arthur Durwood Brown, and nine children. Two of your 12 children died before 1920; her youngest would be born in 1921.
The only Manning in the county was Barney Manning, a dependent in the John A Coats household. Barney was born in New York, and his parents were born in Ireland, so it is unlikely he is related.
Enoch Mannin and John William Manning both fought in the Civil War for the Union.
The Daughters of the American Revolution have 70 Manning results in their Ancestor Search data. Although some of my ancestors were old enough to serve, I have not been able to connect any of them to my tree.
John Bosel Mannin, Sr. was born in Virginia in 1776. I haven’t researched his father or grandfather and don’t know if either were born in the colonies or if they immigrated.
Certainly, the Archie Manning (b. 1949) family is very famous. Archie was a football quarterback. His son Cooper (b. 1974) was a wide receiver. His sons Payton (b. 1976) and Eli (b. 1981) were also quarterbacks in the NFL. The football family continues another generation, with Cooper Manning’s son, Arch, a college football quarterback.[iv]
I have 1,552 known descendants of Meredith Mannin in my tree; 408 Mannin/Manning, 70 Brown, 61 Bryant, 44 Barnett, 28 Horn, 22 Richmond, 21 Ost, and 20 Taylor.
Although I have several photos of my great-grandmother, Mary Elizabeth (Manning) Brown, none of the pictures are from when she was still a Manning. I have no photos of her father, who died when Mary was ten. So, the only direct Manning ancestor I have a picture of is Mary’s grandfather, Enoch Manning.
[i] Common surname origins include:
[ii] I have not had the opportunity to personally research these individuals. As such, their names and dates are tentative and/or speculative.
[iii] Note: There are three different Meredith Mannings who lived in these locations.
[iv] Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manning